User Tools

Site Tools


requirements:use-cases:use-case-dev-ops

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

requirements:use-cases:use-case-dev-ops [2016/11/01 14:54]
Jeremy Sevareid created - migration from old wiki
requirements:use-cases:use-case-dev-ops [2016/11/02 14:07] (current)
Jeremy Sevareid Amend - fixed legacy wiki formatting
Line 1: Line 1:
-FIXME+====== Dev Ops Use Case ======
  
-From hyperledgerproject.slack.com on May 5, 2016: jeremysevareid [12:03 PM] Critical dev ops item came up in Identity WG yesterday and in the face2face general session today - "​Fiduciary Code" - review and promotion of the code base releases probably ought to be locked down and signed via electronic signatures and entitlements and perhaps its own blockchain - this is crucial basis for eating own dog food and tamperproofing - audit/​compliance/​legal review-friendly items needs to start with the code base, runtime crypto and logging is not sufficient+From hyperledgerproject.slack.com on May 5, 2016:  
 + 
 +''​jeremysevareid [12:03 PM] Critical dev ops item came up in Identity WG yesterday and in the face2face general session today - "​Fiduciary Code" - review and promotion of the code base releases probably ought to be locked down and signed via electronic signatures and entitlements and perhaps its own blockchain - this is crucial basis for eating own dog food and tamperproofing - audit/​compliance/​legal review-friendly items needs to start with the code base, runtime crypto and logging is not sufficient''​
requirements/use-cases/use-case-dev-ops.txt · Last modified: 2016/11/02 14:07 by Jeremy Sevareid