This is a static snapshot of the Requirement Working Group's live Google meeting minutes. Meetings before May 9th are not included here.
March 19th, 2018
In our bi-weekly meeting. We sound out a new direction for the ReqWG. Focusing on supply chain requirements for sample mobile code to ease getting going with Hyperledger projects. use case doc live draft
Attendees
Clive Boulton - Independent Hyperledger
Tracy Kuhrt, Community Architect, Hyperledger
Andrew Kennedy - FoodLogiQ, Board Member, Produce Marketing Association
Todd Baggett, RedLine Solutions, Member Produce Marketing Association
Amit Kumar Gupta,Co-Founder/CTO of SIPL .
Virginia Saharopulos, Project Manager, Azzule Systems
More
Link to existing Produce Traceability Initiative Resources:
https://www.producetraceability.org/resources/
March 5th, 2018
Our bi-weekly meeting we’ll discuss architecture requirements for mobile blockchain apps and distributed use cases.
n will drive this.
On solutions we plan ReqWG document specifying the permissions from IoT to AI - Clive will drive this.
We plan these papers as yin and yang to tell what is possible in blockchain and how to implement with Hyperledger projects. With peer review feedback via ReqWG.
In a grander vision we envision working for resources to outline open source implementation of a mobile client app for blockchain transactions. Toward Brian Behlendorf’s vision on Hyperledger's open-source standardization efforts at Mobile World Congress.
https://youtu.be/K6Da9zJYgYY
Attendees
Clive Boulton - Hyperledger ReqWG (Independent)
Aaron Bennington - Blockchain Strategist @ TCS.
Uma Modepalli - Accenture Chicago
Hoa Wang - Blockchain community builder in Romania
February 19th, 2018
In our bi-weekly meeting we concentrated discussions on Permissioned Blockchain requirements. Developing a draft white paper for backfitting modern businesses systems to build secure ecosystem with Hyperledger projects.
Attendees
February 5th, 2018
January 22nd, 2018
Nitesh Emmadi working as Researcher in Security and Privacy group of TCS Innovation Labs, India presented a paper on permissioned blockchains (including HyperLedger Fabric) developments. A use-case titled “MaRSChain: Framework for a Fair Manuscript Review System Based on Permissioned Blockchain”. Here is the link to use-case document (short-version): External Link
Continuing work: Plan is to update the finalized use case to the ReqWG inventory. Also take steps to contribute the POC code to git repo.
ArchWG note this UC uses shell scripts pending planned availability of Hyperledger off-chain scripts.
Attendees
January 8th, 2018
Our next bi-weekly meeting we will parse Distributed Ledgers in 2018? The Hyperledger Community Weighs In! https://www.hyperledger.org/blog/2017/12/20/4590
In addition we discussed blockchain as strategy to decentralise cyber risk in light the Speculative Execution CPU Vulnerability. https://research.google.com/pubs/pub46290.html
We also discussed position papers under way at Architecture-WG. Together with the process by which requirement gaps are shared across Hyperledger projects. Details on audio recording.
Attendees
December 11th, 2017
In today’s bi-weekly call we analyze results from a survey on Requiements Gaps in Hyperledger https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1Mz7hxvfxjY-dJu7KJ7mvedbSni3wRAxllSmxgcYE_hs/edit
Survey review spurs is to promote the survey to wider audience for input and use results to close loop on missing features in Hyperledger projects through cross-collaboration with Architecture and other WGs.
Tracy gave an update on Lisbon Hyperledger Hackfest. Next Hackfest planning underway for February 2018 in NA.
Attendees
Clive Boulton, Hyperledger (Independent)
Neviana Zhgaba. Finance at GE.
Tracy Kuhrt - Community Architect Hyperledger
Kiran Murty - Aura Blocks
Eric - N/A
November 27th, 2017
In today’s bi-weekly call we discuss: Taking the block out of blockchain…. c/o Alphaville. More so we discussed ReqWG inventory of use cases and how we can help with templates and process to author and peer review more use cases.
Attendees
Clive Boulton, Hyperledger (Independent)
Shawn Douglass, Blockchain-startup
Daniela Barbosa, Hyperledger, VP Partners
November 13th 2017
In today’s bi-weekly call we discuss emerging blockchain standards.
10.25.17 Blockchain Beyond Fintech: Brian Behlendorf spoke on panel at the Churchill Club
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=beNtuuWv02A&t=428s
Attendees
Clive Boulton, Independent
Jay Sung, Blockchain Startup Entrepreneur.
October 30th, 2017
We discussed ReqWG tools and process to develop a peer reviewed use case for Trade Settlements (see template and process links on wiki page). David listed his recommended Blockchain Meetups in NYC. Clive mentioned reprised work on Blockchain meets Object-capabilities presented in Vancouver BC after Splash 2017. Audio recording is available here
Attendees
Clive Boulton, Independent
David Boadita, Capital Markets at Accenture
Jason Diebley, State Street Bank
Anon on call.
October 16th, 2017
GE Digital is interested in spurring a discussion on Hyperledger blockchain for Financial Master Data Management in ERP at today’s bi-weekly. If you are interested in ERP at global scale this could be an exciting discussion. Please see our Antitrust Policy
Based on discussion a solid blockchain use case emerged for managing financial metadata between customers and suppliers and ERP. Recommended reading is Ian Grigg's triple entry accounting. Projected productivity benefits are automatic payments automatically managing days outstanding.
Second use case is around counterfeiting. As discussed this was more product and supply chain based than ERP financial metadata.
Attendees
Clive Boulton. Independent Lead, Hyperledger
Neviana Zhgaba. Finance Master Data Management at GE Digital
Aaron Bennington, TCS
October 2nd, 2017
Today's ReqWG discussed 'See Through Coffee' and traceability in co-op supply chains with a goal to building an open coffee supply chain traceability app for co-op growers. Into solving Inventory bullwhip and the UI app interoperability possibilities with chaincode.
We also discussed blockchain for Financial Master Data Management in large scale ERP. GE Digital is interested in a discussing Hyperledger blockchain for Financial Master Data Management in ERP at the next bi-weekly. If you grok SAP or Oracle internal ERP architecture this could be an exciting discussion.
Likewise if you know how to implement smart contracts beyond Fabric Composer, we need community architect input.
Coffee Supply Chain Traceability Use case
https://docs.google.com/a/onda.io/document/d/1xwra8dTin7ZeoGXcJuWjQAiZjEgaQpjBqIOOAzLiDmw/edit?usp=sharing
Attendees
Clive Boulton. ReqWG Lead, Hyperledger ReqWG.
Scott Tupper. Founder, Onda Origins
Veeren Gonugunta. Grad Student Industrial Engineering at Penn SU.
Neviana Zhgaba. Finance Master Data Management at GE Digital
Meeting Recording:
September 17th, 2017
Brian Behlendorf visited our bi-weekly call and challenged us to work together on requirements and sample code to allow applications across different Hyperledger projects. For example Hyperledger Composer for smart contact apps works on Hyperledger Fabric but not on Hyperledger Sawtooth. Today we will discuss your requirements, how we can work together.
To get us started Victor's group has been working on and built a benchmarking project working across different blockchains named Caliper here: https://github.com/Huawei-OSG/caliper
Please take our survey to help us accelerate requirements for Hyperledger apps http://bit.ly/2pKKaKR
Attendees
Sept 3rd, 2017
Meeting cancelled, was US federal holiday.
August 21st, 2017
Attendees:
Marta Piekarska, Hyperledger Director of Ecosystem
Clive Boulton, Independent
Aaron Bennington, TCS
Condensed minutes:
We discussed continuing to work with others on interoperability, client code document for Fabric and Sawtooth. Marta pointed us to Fabric Composer and Sawtooth supply chain demo on fish in lieu of Sawtooth Composer. Aaron will check with TCS for any doco/code that could be shared. Next Hyperledger hackfest is in Chicago Sept 20/21. Following is in Europe (looking at Lisbon/Berlin).
Hyperledger Architecture WG paper is a good read.
Meeting Recording: 20170821-requirments-wg.mp3
August 7th, 2017
Attendees:
Clive Boulton - Independent
Brian Behlendorf - Hyperledger
Chris Clason - Digital Asset
Vikrant Sawant
Condensed minutes: We discussed continuing to work with others on requirements and letting folks know that the ReqWG is here to do so. Further recommendation folks interested in privacy will be interested to check out the technical discussion on Fabric privacy on rocket chat http://chat.hyperledger.org/
Meeting Recording: 20170807-requirments-wg.mp3
July 24th, 2017
July 10th, 2017
Discussed “After-the-fact mandate changes” use case next steps and ReqWG maturity process: Interface with ArchWG and ReqWG use case revision control. May need to present use case at Hyperleger hackfest to gain architecture and other experts consensus. Clive will ask US lawyers to review use case for US Law.
Attendees:
Meeting Recording: 20170810-requirments-wg.mp3
June 26th, 2017
Accept draft of the use case on “After-the-fact mandate changes”.
“After-the-fact mandate changes”.
Attendees:
Oleg Abdrashitov - Altoros
Clive Boulton - Independent
Oskar van Deventer - TNO
Tracy Kuhrt - Community Architect Hyperledger
Rahul Shah - Fulcrum (Axiom Technology Group)
Prajakta Patil - Fulcrum (Axiom Technology Group)
Meeting Recording: 20170626-requirements-wg.mp3
June 12th, 2017
Oskar will walk ReqWG through a first draft of the use case on
“After-the-fact mandate changes”.
Is this a use case that is already covered by the Hyperledger project somewhere?
Should the Hyperledger project consider this use case?
Any comments and suggestions to improve
Attendees:
Oleg Abdrashitov - Altoros
Rieks Joosten - TNO
Oskar van Deventer - TNO
Drummond Reed - Evernym
Clive Boulton - Independent
Frans Tjallingi - Global Data Chain
Aaron Benningfield - TCS
Meeting Recording: 20170612-requirements-wg.mp3
May 15th, 2017
Supply Chain Traceability / Anti-Counterfeiting complete.
Supply Chain Traceability / Anti-Counterfeiting complete
ReqWG Use Case process:
Author use case in Google doc (makes adding tables, diagrams practical).
Circulate for peer input.
Present use case at bi-weekly ReqWG call.
Link Google doc to the ReqWG wiki index page use-case-inventory
Add abstract, author contact and reviewers to complete.
Convert to PDF, upload and update wiki link.
Attendees:
May 1st, 2017
To help expedite your adoption please Take our survey
Review the Supply Chain Traceability use case. Hope to promote to Milestone 2 or beyond - Aaron Benningfield (promoted to completed).
New research alert: Solidus protocol for private transactions from IC3. Call to study the white paper. The protocol is blockchain platform agnostic makes it a candidate for HL either as a standalone contribution or a service to provide confidentiality.
ReqWG Use Case process:
Author use case in Google doc (makes adding tables, diagrams practical).
Circulate for peer input.
Present use case at bi-weekly ReqWG call.
-
Add abstract, author contact and reviewers when completed.
Convert to PDF, upload and update wiki link.
Attendees:
Aaron Benningfield, Independent
Oleg Abdrashitov - Head of Blockchain Practice, Altoros
Clive Boulton - Independent
Oskar van Deventer - TNO
David Boadita - Independent
Frans Tjallingii - Vancouver blockchain start-up
Mike Zaccardo - Cloudsoft`
Duc Trinh - ???
April 17, 2017
April 3, 2017
March 6th, 2017
February 6th, 2017
Hyperledger is moving from Slack to Rocket Chat. Please use your Linux Foundation identity to sign here http://chat.hyperledger.org/ Push the CAS button (you will hear a bong sound signifies success).
Discussed at Hyperledger Sessions at the Presidio Feb 2-3 and afterwards on Rocket Chat.
“We need to really start discussing more and more specific requirements on the current projects we have in HL. Bring items forward in Jira, if deemed required… complex and a lot of less complex, items as well.
Attendees:
Use Case Inventory Status:
-
Clive looking for
Supply Chain Logistics domain experts in addition to Airbus to peer review written requirements.
Derivative:
Ex-IBMers looking into hosting ‘office hours’ in NYC to discuss requirements / code up HL projects (informal for now) anyone interested please reach out on Rocket Chat.
http://chat.hyperledger.org/ or attend next bi-weekly webex and connect.
January 23rd
Attendees:
Agenda:
Follow-ups:
Strawman Requirements on the Trusted Execution Environment by Jeremy Sevareid, presented at NYC Hyperledger Hackfest to RWG (Dec 5-6) ties into ‘upcoming’ at Stanford.
Upcoming:
December 19th
Attendees:
Mike Zaccardo, Cloudsoft
Duncan Johnston-Watt, Cloudsoft
Clive Boulton, Independent
Oleg Abdrashitov, Altos
Agenda:
Discussed in NYC at Hyperledger Hackfest was shifting WG start time a bit later. Requested by Cisco and Altos (Oleg to confirm).
Requirements signatures in KYC and Supply Chain Logistics quality certifications, similarities noted by authors (Jeremy Sevareid, Clive Boulton). Making smart contact more universal requirements between finance and supply chain.
Follow-ups:
New WG bi-weekly meeting time proposal in 2017 1pm est / 10am pst.
Next WG meeting is Jan 9, 2017, and Jan 23, 2017 etc…
December 6th
Many of the WG attended the Hyperledger Hackfest in NY, the 12/5 WG meeting took place on 12/6 for 2 hours.
Attendees:
Jeremy Sevareid, Independent
Oleg Abdrashitov, Altos
Thomas Barnes, Intel
Judy Priest, Cisco Systems
Clive Boulton, Independent
Dr Pan Qiuling, Huawei
Agenda:
Items Covered:
-
Trusted cloud solution architecture (heartbleed, Linux Foundation laptop).
Trusted over time (long running blockchain smart contract transactions).
Blockstack (RSA keys not used anymore, keys stolen).
Should specify standard metadata for Smart Contacts (SEC, Federal Reserve interaction with the web) in order to build a datagram (Google Beyond Corp example).The Smart Contract should know who it’s running on (Intel, Cisco, Huawei / USA, UK, Hongkong).
Shared
Follow-ups:
Consideration to continue Jeremy’s Requirements Strawman (The Trusted but Verifiable Execution Environment). Really analyze properly.
Do we need to specify requirements chain end-point to chain end-point or key management device to key management device or client chain to client chain (how to facilitate achieving these ends).
November 21st
Attendees:
Agenda:
NYC Hackathon
-
Walk-through
Items Covered:
Supply Chain
Bill of materials processing - basis of ERP - originated by IBM back in 1970s
Written on premise of central database within four walls, but now end-to-end supply chain
Transitioning to demand-driven ERP with minimal inventory
Inventory receipts and inventory issues are core transactions
APICS - American Production Inventory Control Society
Messaging system + database + inventory system + inferred business agreements / explicit terms and conditions especially around quality of goods delivered
Smart contracts need to address quality E.g., if quality correct, payment is automatic
E.g., What is quality with what metrics as judged by whom, what and when? ISO certified? GS consumer industry labeling? Certified scales? HL7?
Authentication of attributes; quality checks; cross-checks
Execute allocations if quality checks are met
Not just allocate / execute against inventory
References:
Design/Implementations Implications
Inventory & Requirements
Follow-ups:
November 7th
Attendees:
Oleg Abdrashitov (Altoros)
Clive Boulton (Independent)
Jeremy Sevareid (Independent)
Darryl Adams (Intel)
Michael Wall (TBC)
Brian Ahier (TBC)
Agenda:
Wiki Migration (Jeremy)
Participation (Jeremy)
Items Covered:
Follow-ups:
Newly Closed
Open
New
Use Case Authors - Revisit use case inventory / status - Nov 21st
Requirements Doc - Jeremy - initial pass at inventory of common requirements - Nov 21st
Supply Chain use case - Clive - Nov 21st
Encouraging / working with new requirement WG participants - TBD
October 24th
Attendees:
Agenda:
R3 Contribution
Hackathons
Risk Assessment
Scalability Requirements
Items Covered:
Risk Assessment
Protect against requirements and test cases discussion
First draft risk assessment created for Membership Services
Runbook / operations best practices are needed as well given not all risks can be mitigated solely by code
IBM-supported Cornell IC3 effort
Proposed Follow-ups
Mark - Create simple flow diagram for membership services (e.g., adding a new peer)
Mark - Check on availability for release of IBM internal document that examined mapping of openfabric vs. industry requirements/standards (e.g., NIST)
Others - see open items below:
Update on Last Time’s Follow-ups
Mark - Reach out to Brian B. for SIBOS recap to share
Mark - Start email thread on fabric v1 risk assessment
Ann - Look at options for inventorying a) existing efforts, b) artifacts, c) wiki migration
Jeremy - Map out specific hyperledger examples for TOGAF/Zachman to illustrate applicability
October 10th
Attendees:
Agenda:
Items Covered:
TOGAF/Zachman seems reasonable but need to see examples
Gap analysis of suitability of ledger by functionality, non-functional requirements and security needs a structured inventory of what’s already been done
Something like that will make it easier for contributors to know how to help
Recap of IBM Bluemix Garage Hyperledger Hackathon in NYC
-
-
-
Proposed Follow-ups
Mark - Reach out to Brian B. for SIBOS recap to share
Mark - Start email thread on fabric v1 risk assessment
Ann - Look at options for inventorying a) existing efforts, b) artifacts, c) wiki migration
Jeremy - Map out specific hyperledger examples for TOGAF/Zachman to illustrate applicability
Share:
September 26th
Attendees:
Clive Boulton - Independent
Jeremy Sevareid - Independent
Mark Parzygnat - IBM
Anirudha Joshi - INVeSHARE
Yogi Golle - Independent
Patrick Holmes - Intel
Howard Huang - Huawei
Agenda:
Items Covered:
-
Markup ‘Proposed Requirements Template’ to give examples on each tier.
Tiered Rqmts (Jeremy) vs Telco Flow Rqmts (Partick).
Feeling is keep Flow Rqmts but annotate with examples (Jeremy to share)
-
Handle gnarly privacy rqmts by adding a Jira issue (include link to rqmts doc).
-
September 15th
Attendees:
Agenda:
Items Covered:
Sibos demos (clearing house + bond trading) Oleg
-
Clive has been working on supply chain and provenance for beef industry (GS1 has a standard for attributes but no trading infrastructure). Plan is to define requirements
August 29th
August 22nd - No mtg
August 15th
Attendees:
-
Clive Boulton (Independent)
Mark Parzygnat (IBM)
Nagesh Avusingi (Independent)
Anirudha Joshi (INVeSHARE)
Nikilesh Subramoniapillai Ajeetha
Agenda:
Items covered:
-
August 8th
Attendees:
-
Anirudha Joshi - INVeSHARE
Clive Boulton - (Independent)
Mark Parzygnat (IBM)
Nagesh Avusingi (Independent)
Sergei Mayorov (Moscow Exchange)
Agenda:
Items covered:
For KYC: Consider Camlistore for non-chain document storage
https://camlistore.org/ (contact Clive for more on CLI sharing for demo)
August 1st
Attendees:
-
Jeremy Sevareid - Independent
Nagesh Avusingi (nravusingi@gmail.com) - Independent
Anirudha Joshi - INVeSHARE
-
-
Agenda:
Risk Assessment Worksheet approach (Jeremy Sevareid, Bill Sparks)
-
Review of Hackathon (San Fran) - Mark
Items covered:
Jeremy presented Risk Assessment and Controls
Mark - will send out first email subject define: Privacy vs Confidentiality and have Brian start the requirements email list.
Mark with Review of SF hackathon
-
-
Welcome Nagesh Avusingi to the group
July 25th
Attendees:
Oleg Abdrashitov - Altoros
Clive Boulton - Independent
Anirudha Joshi - INVeSHARE
Jeremy Sevareid - Independent
Mohan - IT people Corp
Agenda:
Items covered:
Segmentation of supply-chain-related use cases
Certification
Provenance
Supply chain
Two-phase Commit / ACID Transactionality / Consensus Algorithm
Requirements use cases and events
Images, binaries of complex documents
May need to reside in code repositories to allow for version-controlled, version-specific production documentation tagged release tie outs
Alternative may to release documents from within included database similar to Camlistore (
http://camlistore.org)
Suggestion made in TSC call last Thursday for repository for binary documents (e.g., PDFs) that may be separate from code repositories for specific projects (e.g., fabric, sawtooth lake)
July 18th
Attendees:
Oleg Abdrashitov - Altoros
Clive Boulton - Independent
Anirudha Joshi - INVeSHARE
Jeremy Sevareid - Independent
Mark Parzygnat - IBM
Mohan - IT people Corp
Ratnakar - IT People Corp
Craig Rowe - Independent
Dan Conlon - DTCC
Vaniprasad Kommera - DTCC
Agenda:
Items covered:
Rename use case to certification.
Expand use case to three cases.
Do track every component.
Chain of custody (diamond) certification diamond.
Don’t track every component (cars). Linkages between real world products (peanuts / strawberries and food processing plants).
Demo: saving digital art on-blockchain vs on-premises
July 11th
Attendees:
Oleg Abdrashitov - Altoros
Jeremy Sevareid - Independent
Anirudha Joshi - INVeSHARE
Mark Parzygnat - IBM
Agenda
Items covered:
July 4th - No mtg
No meeting on July 4th due to US holiday
June 27th
Attendees:
Oleg Abdrashitov - Altoros
Anirudha Joshi - INVeSHARE
Shane Neighbors - INVeSHARE
Jeremy Sevareid - Independent
Clive Boulton - Independent
Jatinder Bali - Citigroup
Craig Rowe - Independent
Agenda:
June 20th
Attendees:
Oleg Abdrashitov - Altoros
Jeremy Sevareid - Independent
Frank Lu - IBM
Anirudha Joshi - INVeSHARE
Nikilesh Subramoniapillai Ajeetha
Vaniprasad Kommera - DTCC
Agenda:
Discussed
June 13th
Attendees:
Oleg Abdrashitov - Altoros
Anirudha Joshi - INVeSHARE
Jeremy Sevareid - Independent
Primrose Mbanefo - Accenture
Frank Lu - IBM
Mark Parzygnat - IBM
Craig Rowe - Independent
Jean Safar - Calypso Technology
Agenda:
Are our wiki pages clear? Improve navigation?
Updates to DvP use case?
-
Implementation detail sections removed
List requirements and support them with use cases?
Or tell user stories and requirements per story?
Clear identity matrix?
Membership services
role | smart contract code | function payload | caller identity | ledger data |
validating node | | | | |
permissioned user | | | | |
any user | | | | |
References:
Use Case Template
DvP post trade use case
Architecture WG proposal
Requirements Template
Asset Depository use case
Incubated Project Exit Criteria working draft
TSC meeting minutes last week about request for office hours for Working Groups during virtual hackathon this week
Follow-ups:
Oleg - Add assumptions, service-level agreements and data protection as sections to the Use Case Template
Jeremy - Add additional narrative to business requirements sub-section of Use Case Post Trade
Jeremy - Continue harvest of functional details from templates and other discussions
June 6th
Attendees:
Jeremy Sevareid - Independent
Frank Lu - IBM
Mark Parzygnat - IBM
Andreas Fletcher - Deutche Börse Group
Nikilesh - Community
Shane Neighbors - INVeSHARE
Anirudha Joshi - INVeSHARE
Oleg Abdrashitov - Altoros
Decisions:
Notes:
Follow-ups:
Oleg - Create proposed use case light template
Mark - Reach out to TSC members for guidance on how to move Post Trade use case forward
Jeremy - Enrich Post Trade use case’s section on participants, bootstrapping the transferable items onto the chain and privacy
Jeremy - Migrate some functional details from exit criteria discussion and from use case template into separate list of technical/non-functional/functional requirements
May 31st
Attendees:
Agenda
Delivery vs Payment by Jeremy Sevareid
Corporate Action by Frank Lu
Role of a payment system in Delivery vs Payment, Escrow and other use cases
Agreed to treat payment and other systems feeding data from the world to the blockchain as participants on the chain; avoid calling them oracles
Proposed to simplify the template by removing sections describing implementation details like State and Transitions
May 23rd
Attendees:
Frank Lu - IBM
Oleg Abdrashitov - Altoros
Anirudha Joshi - INVeSHARE
Rahul Sharma - INVeSHARE
Shane Neighbors - INVeSHARE
Jeremy Sevareid - Independent
Vishal Jadhav - Bloomberg LP
Primrose Mbanefo - Accenture
Discussed
* Interest Rate Swap, Currency Swap
* Asset Depository collaborated with Frank Lu
* trading scenarios, OTC, exchanges, settlement, clearing corps. Will reach out to DTCC to review and contribute
* how much workflow or implementation detail to include in use cases docs. Create functional requirements doc?
Development plan for next week
* Equity Contracts, Fixed Income - Oleg Abdrashitov
* Delivery vs Payment - Jeremy Sevareid
* P2P Insurance
* KYC Database
* Corporate Action - Frank Lu
May 16th
Attendees:
Christopher Allen - Blockstream
Stuart Turner - Eurostep Digital
Mark Parzygnat - IBM
Frank Lu - IBM
Oleg Abdrashitov - Altoros
Roger Strukhoff - Altoros
Vishal Jadhav - Bloomberg LP
Jatinder Bali - Citigroup
Primrose Mbanefo - Accenture
Oleg to discuss the first Finance usecase on 5/23
Oleg is working with LF to create mail lists so that SME’s in areas (component and markets) can self subscribe, so we can notify relevant mailing list when a use case is going to be reviewed. (Oleg if you need assistance on this let me know - @markparz)
Items Covered:
-
call to WG members to adopt a use case to bring to Milestone 1
Oleg Abdrashitov chose 3 use cases to develop, plan a week to reach Milestone 1
Mark Parzygnat's suggestion: moved the index to the project home page
Mark Parzygnat's suggestion: develop first the use cases more suitable for the ones in incubation, i.e. permissioned chains
Mark Parzygnat's suggestion: create mail lists so that SME’s in areas (component and markets) can self subscribe, so we can notify relevant mailing list when a use case is going to be reviewed
-
-
May 9th
Attendees:
* Patrick Holmes announced his resignation
* Oleg Abdrashitov proposed [ideas to improve the development of the Requirements Document](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BlWWgtGArBb7v_cJsaJ9SsMclRHNfEdaJ623CrDHez8/edit?pref=2&pli=1)
Feedback loop: the requirements should feed the Architecture WG and influence their decisions. Produce a monthly report of the new use cases and requirements.
Depth: the use cases need to be further developed and conform to the template.
Coverage: reach out to industry experts to gather new use cases.
These ideas were supported by the WG and by other key members of the project prior to the meeting.
* Oleg started implementing:
-
created and analyzed a database of the project members on Slack to determine experts from the industries not yet covered by use cases. Will reach out to solicit their input.
working to normalize existing use cases to conform to the template
* there's a concern that some project members may be bound by NDAs not to reveal their use cases. One of the solutions is to bring the existing use cases to the experts and have them not volunteer but only validate or comment on them.
* a suggestion was made to approach the Linux community for the new use cases
* Christopher Allen walked thru his contribution to the Requirements section of the Use Case template. Proposed to introduce Policy and Regulatory Requirements section
* The WG agreed to introduce milestones into the development of the use cases
Milestone 1: Sections 1 (Intro and User Stories) and Section 2 (States and Transitions). When completed, announce to the Architecture and other WGs.
Milestone 2: Section 3 (Requirements). Work with the Architecture group to develop technical requirements such as Correctness, Privacy, Hardware
* Nikilesh Subramoniapillai Ajeetha shared a mindmap of the requirements space captured so far by WG. It can be accessed [here](https://coggle.it/diagram/VwXUxFREA9UkQydB)
Notes:
Christopher Allen - Went over the general requirements, correctness and privacy requirements listed in the Hyperledger project wiki
Christopher Allen - Permissioned or Permissionless is a hugely grey area from Requirements perspective. Taking a binary approach may not be the right approach. A permissioned system may need the properties of the permissionless system.
Oleg- Hardware requirements- what are the requirements for thin clients? , Privacy Requirements?
Christopher Allen - Need more inputs on Hardware requirements( from IOT devices perspective)
-