User Tools

Site Tools


groups:healthcare:2018_12_04_ehr_hcwg

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
groups:healthcare:2018_12_04_ehr_hcwg [2018/12/04 19:38]
Rich Bloch [Old Business]
groups:healthcare:2018_12_04_ehr_hcwg [2018/12/04 21:11]
Rich Bloch [New Business]
Line 65: Line 65:
   * ** Discussion: "a bottom up approach"​ email follow up (Steven Elliot)**   * ** Discussion: "a bottom up approach"​ email follow up (Steven Elliot)**
  
 +
 +<WRAP box>
 +  * Good general discussion around how a future subgroup will need to consider a more global (non-US) understanding of healthcare systems, whether public or private: we cannot be limited to a purely US-centric view of healthcare solutions (Mikhail)
 +  * High level of continuing interest in an Interoperability Subgroup, or some form of communications channel that takes into account the cross-cutting nature of healthcare interoperability and blockchain technologies (Steven)
 +  * Also a continued interest expressed in a future Public Health Subgroup, depending in large part on how the SIG re-aligned itself going forward (Mikhail)
 +  * Bob introduced the group to the Healthcare Services Platform Consortium (HSPC), indicating that this group is doing some similar work with interoperability
 +  * HSPC has some very big players in this space: Commonwell Health Alliance, Intermountain Healthcare, Care Equality, Cerner (creator), and others
 +  * A mention that the HSPC might be tightly-wedded with Cerner (the #2 EHR vendor in the US)
 +  * No known work being done in the HSPC using blockchain technologies
 +  * Also a note that the HSPC might be US-centric (a counterpoint that there'​s work being done with the HSPC in Africa)
 +  * Steven indicated that it'd be useful to consider the HSPC as a good resource in the future, perhaps a collaborator on some kind of future Hyperledger healthcare project/​service
 +  * Blockchain technologies using AI/​predictive analytics/​machine learning may be another area of future SIG subgroup interest
 +  * Mention that India is significantly growing their investments in country-wide healthcare systems, many solutions heavily tech-centric
 +  * Sonia asked and agreed to continue to lead the Ad Hoc Subgroup Review Team
 +  * Sonia urged that we need to push to generate something concrete (a project or POC), but we need goals at the SIG level
 +  * Rich indicated that this team (Ad Hoc team) will need to push the discussion "​up"​ to the SIG level to engage membership, and particularly subgroup leads
 +  * This EMR Subgroup focus needs to segue into a broader, membership-wide discussion that looks at SIG level changes in the coming year (2019)
 +  * Mikhail asked that it would be good to put together some kind of plan or shorter-term goal (Steven in agreement)
 +  * Some discussion on perhaps some level of confusion between what this team is proposing going forward ("​what'​s the take-away?"​)
 +  * Steven indicated that we should be focussed on developing a architecture for pluggable services
 +  * Sonia indicated that she believes that all subgroup leads do need to understand what this team is proposing
 +  * Some disconnect on where this Ad Hoc team needs to go next (need "​clarity of vision"​ and another meeting before 12/14)
 +</​WRAP>​
 ===== Next Meeting ===== ===== Next Meeting =====
  
groups/healthcare/2018_12_04_ehr_hcwg.txt ยท Last modified: 2018/12/04 21:13 by Rich Bloch