User Tools

Site Tools



This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
groups:healthcare:2018_11_20_ehr_hcwg [2018/11/20 15:51]
Rich Bloch
groups:healthcare:2018_11_20_ehr_hcwg [2018/11/20 17:26]
Rich Bloch [Old Business]
Line 21: Line 21:
   * [[https://​​HL-antitrust-slide|Hyperledger Antitrust Slide]]   * [[https://​​HL-antitrust-slide|Hyperledger Antitrust Slide]]
   * **Discussion:​ request for note-taking for this meeting**   * **Discussion:​ request for note-taking for this meeting**
 +<WRAP box>
 +In attendance:
 +  * Rich Bloch
 +  * Ben Djidi
 +  * Sonia
 +  * Mikhail Elias
 ===== Introductions ===== ===== Introductions =====
Line 37: Line 45:
   * Status on current work efforts   * Status on current work efforts
   * * **Discussion:​ open discussion on expectations and direction of this subgroup**   * * **Discussion:​ open discussion on expectations and direction of this subgroup**
 +<WRAP box>
 +  * Discussion of past EMR Subgroup meetings
 +  * Sonia and Rich attended the last known EMR Subgroup meeting (10/02), which is believed to have been the last meeting of the subgroup
 +  * Past meeting emphasized an EMR solution from the provider perspective
 +  * Expectation is that the current work on our HLHCWG charter review/​revision will help set the proper tenor going forward
 +  * Question about the distinction between EMRs and EHRs
 +    * EHRs are a broader interpretation of electronic health records management, while...
 +    * EMRs are typically a subset of an EHR, generally provider-facing,​ used in provider practices (satellite to larger healthcare systems)
 +  * Larger question of whether this subgroup focus on EHRs or the provider (harmonizing with the other subgroups: patient and payer)
 +    * Concept surfaced of whether it makes sense to view use cases from the end-user perspective (application layer / top down)
 +      * What if we viewed our work as bottom up, more as a provider of a healthcare platform of services?
 +      * Cross-cutting issues of data management, security, and interoperability fall into the context of this approach
 +      * Implications touch all current subgroups
 +      * Important to maintain an understanding that WGs exist to drive issues in the proper context (in this case, healthcare) up to Hyperledger leadership such that architectural/​feature improvements can be made to improve frameworks/​toolsets
 +    * Public healthcare could be one way to rescope the focus for this (or another, separate) subgroup
 ===== New Business ===== ===== New Business =====
Line 42: Line 69:
   * Seeking new lead for this subgroup   * Seeking new lead for this subgroup
     * **Discussion:​ recommendations/​nominations?​**     * **Discussion:​ recommendations/​nominations?​**
 +<WRAP box>
 +  * From the good discussions from today'​s meeting, the group has decided to spin up an ad hoc committee to do some additional due diligence in advance of the next meeting
 +    * Sonia has volunteered to serve as lead for this team, with Ben and Mikhail working with Sonia
 +    * Rich will loop Steven Elliot (not in attendance) into the team, as Steven and Mikhail have complementary thoughts
 +  * Our next meeting will continue the discussion about how best to shape the charter of this subgroup going forward
groups/healthcare/2018_11_20_ehr_hcwg.txt ยท Last modified: 2018/11/20 17:26 by Rich Bloch